tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2883204318916261809.post56342723245341795..comments2022-05-22T13:35:55.986+02:00Comments on Changwat, Amphoe, Tambon: Population statistics 2011 at province levelAndyhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/17710647861853833065noreply@blogger.comBlogger6125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2883204318916261809.post-20409073367080158172012-10-15T10:51:13.709+02:002012-10-15T10:51:13.709+02:00I don't know any other resource on the net whi...I don't know any other resource on the net which has that numbers. The Amphoe and Tambon with the highest population is still easy to get from that DOPA data with a little help of my software - Mueang Samut Prakan with 506997 citizen and Mueang Nakhon Ratchasima with 441309 are the most populous Amphoe. Hat Yai with 157161 and Nai Mueang (in Nakhon Ratchasima) with 138698 are the most populous Tambon. For population density can only give you the Amphoe, and right now only based on the 2000 census data. Pom Prap Sattru Phai with 45187/km² and Samphanthawong with 30182/km² are the most populous Amphoe (actually Khet, since these are in Bangkok).Andyhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/17710647861853833065noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2883204318916261809.post-29121962890477111942012-10-15T04:48:47.945+02:002012-10-15T04:48:47.945+02:00Since you have alot of knowledge of the statistics...Since you have alot of knowledge of the statistics of Thailand. Where would be a good place to find out the most population or the most densely populated tambon and amphoe in Thailand? Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2883204318916261809.post-55944396327709587202012-06-14T08:40:15.665+02:002012-06-14T08:40:15.665+02:00This statistics by DOPA is based on the registrati...This statistics by DOPA is based on the registration data, but it does include most of the municipalities (except some of the most recently former TAO) and goes down to the subdistrict level. As I said before, the census data is probably the one which is closer to reality, but still no sign of the data for the 2010 census. And for the 2000 census, at least the data available on the net did only go down to district level, separated between municipal and non-municipal population. But in case there is more than one municipality in one district, there's no way to get the two numbers separated.Andyhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/17710647861853833065noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2883204318916261809.post-71384515976289533032012-06-14T01:19:47.940+02:002012-06-14T01:19:47.940+02:00Is there any chance to get to actual number of peo...Is there any chance to get to actual number of people in a particular city. (More interested than cities than provinces). So not just by house registration, but also including migrants who move to a city without acquiring property (or otherwise registering as a resident) ?Han CNXhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/07046774958084230339noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2883204318916261809.post-1452336232368301852012-05-23T15:02:21.002+02:002012-05-23T15:02:21.002+02:00Yes, the data is based on the where each citizen h...Yes, the data is based on the where each citizen has registered himself. Thus there are of course systematic errors due to those migrant workers from Isan who are still registered in their home village but live in Bangkok most of the time, but when comparing the data from different years these systematic errors should roughly cancel out. More close to the reality are the census data, which uses where one actually lived at the date of the census (and also includes the non-Thai residents) - but these are only done every ten years, and the data from 2010 is still not available online :-(Andyhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/17710647861853833065noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2883204318916261809.post-37592955746436766572012-05-23T13:25:29.474+02:002012-05-23T13:25:29.474+02:00based on housebooks/ ID cards no realitybased on housebooks/ ID cards no realityTom Rolling Stonehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/07871584789808491394noreply@blogger.com